Original Research

Public participation power dynamics in strategic development planning in a metropolitan municipality: Eastern Cape Province

Modeni M. Sibanda, Liezel Lues
Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation | Vol 2 | a44 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v2i0.44 | © 2021 Modeni M. Sibanda, Liezel Lues | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 30 September 2021 | Published: 17 December 2021

About the author(s)

Modeni M. Sibanda, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Commerce, University of Fort Hare, Bisho, South Africa
Liezel Lues, Department of Public Administration and Management, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Public participation in municipal strategic development planning processes does not occur in a vacuum; it is juxtaposed within contextual community realities of power, politics, institutional, systemic practices, cultures and inequities in resource capacity, amongst other relational social practices.

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the nature of power dynamics in participatory governance platforms and spaces during municipal strategic development planning processes and the extent to which they impact developmental outcomes in a metropolitan municipality.

Setting: A metropolitan municipality in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.

Methods: An interpretive, constructivist, cross-sectional exploratory case study collected in-depth qualitative data from purposefully sampled participants (n = 34) using focus-group discussions. Qualitative data were processed using NVivo 8 computer software and analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results: The results indicated mixed views on participants’ satisfaction with public participation in municipal strategic development planning processes. Participants reported inadequate knowledge, capacity and capability; resource limits; political exclusion and language barriers, which muted community voice and disempowered, marginalised and excluded some residents from meaningfully participating and articulating community voice, priorities and needs.

Conclusion: Public participation in municipal strategic development planning in the metropolitan municipality is at best tokenistic, constituting mere ‘window dressing,’ co-option and ‘pretence’ of inclusion of communities/residents in public participation platforms and spaces. Whilst on the surface, public participation appears inclusive of a range of stakeholders, at best powerful andr elite interests shape strategic development planning outcomes. A local governance framework for enhancing community voice in public participation platforms and spaces is recommended.


Keywords

public participation; power dynamics; strategic development planning; structuration theory; local governance; metropolitan municipality

Metrics

Total abstract views: 5987
Total article views: 14157

 

Crossref Citations

1. Navigating perceived innovation uncertainties associated with digital tools in planning consultations
Jimin Oh, Yvonne Rydin
Planning Practice & Research  vol: 40  issue: 5  first page: 1173  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1080/02697459.2025.2528129

2. Analyzing Sociodemographic Factors Influencing Citizen Participation: The Case of Infrastructure Planning in Khon Kaen, Thailand
Peeranun Panyavaranant, Thi Phuoc Lai Nguyen, Djoen San Santoso, Vilas Nitivattananon, Takuji W. Tsusaka
Social Sciences  vol: 12  issue: 4  first page: 225  year: 2023  
doi: 10.3390/socsci12040225

3. Accountability, inclusivity, effectiveness, and leaving no one behind
John Mamokhere
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478)  vol: 11  issue: 10  first page: 191  year: 2022  
doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2206

4. The Impact of Public Participation Through Invited and Invented Spaces on Water Supply in Urban Informal Settlements
Bukiwe Ntwana, Vinothan Naidoo
Urban Forum  vol: 35  issue: 4  first page: 571  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1007/s12132-024-09523-4

5. Pragmatic implementation and promotion of good governance principles in realizing Sustainable Development Goal Six (6) in South Africa
John Mamokhere
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478)  vol: 11  issue: 6  first page: 20  year: 2022  
doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1921

6. 6360 SAYILI YASANIN HALKIN BELEDİYE ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ MAÇKA ÖRNEĞİ
Batuhan Aydın, Emrah Firidin
Kamu Yönetimi ve Politikaları Dergisi  vol: 4  issue: 2  first page: 277  year: 2023  
doi: 10.58658/kaypod.1307323

7. Governance for Resilient Rural Livelihoods in the Face of Pandemics and Disasters – Insights from Rural South Africa
Betty Claire Mubangizi
E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences  first page: 1503  year: 2025  
doi: 10.38159/ehass.20256818